| Model release question Back
to Top
1. After I shoot
portraits of clients, if I want to display those
photos in my studio, do I need their model release
and permission? 2. If the subject is, say, a singer,
and after obtaining a model release and permission
for my studio display, can my brother also display
that same photo in his office? The singer is already
a public figure, what if the subject is just another
pretty person? 3. Same scenario as above, what if I
put the subject into another landscape picture
digitally? Do I need another set of model releases
and permission?
Nathan
Dear Nathan:
Being in the photography business is a great thing.
Several rules that I believe are good to live by are
as follows. Never do anything with the customers
image without their written permission. In addition,
if I decide to do something in the future with their
image that I feel they might or might not want me to,
I will speak to them about it personally and get
their verbal permission. At this moment, with the
model release I already have legal permission to do
what I wish but it is important to respect the
feelings and rights of others so as a pure courtesy
to my customer (also known as a friend), I will call
them and tell them what I am up to and that I just
wanted to be sure they are happy with it. They are
usually very aware that I took the extra step out of
respect for them and are all smiles about it. It
makes a very good impression and you protect your
relationship with the customer in the process. There
is little benefit to doing something that will hurt
someone's feelings or cause them to feel betrayed.
Taking care of others is always the best way to take
care of yourself and your business.
Another one of my rules is that the truth is most
important. Always tell the truth about everything.
Even if you make a big goof, spell it out and deal
with it. The grief of having a customer catch you in
a lie just to cover up a simple mistake is just not a
good thing. The truth requires no notes to help you
remember what you said and its just the plain
old right thing to do in the first place.
If you believe your work may include digital
manipulation or alteration of the setting then you
need a model release that covers just such situations
and possibly even use in electronic media such as the
Internet. Your release should include a line similar
to the following :
created on or prior to _________________, for
public display and/or in all media and in all manners
including composite and/or enhanced representations,
for advertising, trade, educational materials or any
other lawful purposes.
This is not intended to be legal advice and you
should have a proper release made with the aid of a
lawyer. I make my own releases and word them
carefully so as to be correct but to not read as if
we are going to do something terrible to the
customer. I then have them looked at by a lawyer for
minor corrections We must indeed protect ourselves
but we also need to respect the client as well. My
policy is just this. If a customer came to me 2 years
after giving me total release with their images and
requested that I not use them anymore, I would comply
if anyway possible out of respect for my client. In
19 years of business it has never happened and
believe it or not, the majority of my releases are
from Boudoir sittings which is our largest
speciality. The trust that I earn from my customers
allows me to literally go years between people who
say no to signing a release.
I am sure others would take issue with this but to me
being a public figure makes no difference in what I
can do with the images. I get the same permission
paper signed for everyone. And that is what I call
it. A permission paper. Not a model release which has
some degree of negative stigma attached to it.
Back
to Top
|