| Some folks enter at the
deep end of the photography pool with little prior
knowledge of how studio lights and meters work. This Q
and A page is dedicated to these people who are often
frustrated by a lack of solid basic information.
Remember, there are no dumb questions other than the ones
you don't ask. - Scott
Table of Contents Beginner
advice |
Beginner adviceI am a novice to studio
lighting. I am wondering if your lighting book will be a
good start for me? I have been an amateur photographer
for many years and I recently got hooked on studio
lighting. The creativity just fascinates me. I am
thinking about buying some studio equipment. I would
appreciate your comment on equipment that you recommend
(not too expensive!!). I have been thinking about getting
into studio photography as a side business. Do you think
it's achievable for me, or is it just a dream that I
won't be able to do? I know it's hard to master studio
lighting and probably takes years of practice Back to Top |
| Common questions about studio lights & photography Scott, I recently
purchased the Novatron 60-V400 2C Kit. Studio lighting is
completely foreign to me and I am so confused I hope you
can help. I am totally lost and overwhelmed. Noted below
are my questions. If you will take one step at a time and keep your learning focused on the science of light rather than on the equipment used, you will grow in your knowledge much faster. Letting yourself be influenced by every new opinion that you hear at the camera store will only serve to frustrate you and blur the road toward your goals. - Scott Back to Top |
| Film for beginners
Need some advice for which
film to choose for a beginner using 35mm camera.
Hopefully I won't be using this camera for long but
nothing else fit my budget. Don't want to ruin my image
by using film that isn't going to do a nice job. Any tips
will be greatly appreciated. |
| Over-exposed images
I took some pictures of a
40 mile race this weekend using my film camera. The
pictures looked overexposed, but I only use natural
lighting. Do you have any idea of what I did wrong? |
| Modeling lights - on or off
Even though this question was answered in the common questions Q & A above, it is such a common question that I feel I should include it as a topic all to itself. Question: When I am making portraits of people in the camera room with my studio strobes, should I shut my modeling lights off when it's time to take the photograph or leave them on? Will they effect the image if I leave them on? Answer : When you work with studio lighting equipment that has both flash units and modeling lights in the same head, they are intended to be used with all of the lights operating. The modeling lights are there so you can see what you are doing, where the light is going, where the shadow is going, where the hair light is, background light and so on. Without the modeling lights you might as well put a blind fold on. You cannot see what you are doing. If you are working in a room where the ambient light from windows or other lights in the room are interfering with your ability to see where your lighting is, you have a problem. Your camera room should be dark like a darkroom. If it's not, then you have no idea what you are doing and will never learn the art of lighting. Your room must be dark and your modeling lights must be on at all times so you can see continuously what your lighting is doing even if your subject moves around. When you are ready to take the photograph, you don't shut the modeling lights off. Their total output is dramatically less than your strobe output so they will not record on film in any appreciable quantity. Think about it. It would really be a pain to have to turn of the modeling lights before all of your images are made. Bottom line? LEAVE THOSE BABIES ON! |
| Rating the film at a
different ISO Due to the frequency of this question I have also included it in the Film, Light and Color Q & A section. Hardly a day goes by without me receiving this question. The answer is rather involved so I need to include something that will help young photographers understand why this is an important concept. The question relates to film rather than digital cameras. If you are using a digital camera however, you still need to establish a working ISO that you use all the time so your exposures are correct and predictable. Testing your digital camera for this is much like the test that I teach in my Lighting Book only reversed since the big concern is not so much detail in the shadows but detail in the highlights. Question: In your web site, you mention rating the film at a different ISO than is recommended by the manufacture. Can you explain why? Answer: The answer to your question is
fairly involved but very important to making correct
exposures. In my lighting book, this topic takes a
significant amount of space. Did you know that meters can vary more than a half stop from one to the next? That is significant just as is the fact that cameras shutter speeds vary as do the apertures of lenses. Usually not to a great extent but all of these factors add up and contribute to your overall exposure. Photographers who rate their film as indicated on the box are assuming that the film was intended to be rated this way because of a general assumption about the way that photographers take meter readings. When photographers talk about film speed, they will frequently mention how they rate their film but rarely do they mention HOW they take their meter readings. One is absolutely as important as the other because how you take meter readings determines how your meter reads the light. The common assumption is that meter readings will be made with the dome of the meter facing toward the camera and NOT toward the main source of illumination. This method of metering arbitrarily over exposes the film because it is based on the lower fill light rather on the main light as it should be. The advantage for the film companies is that their film appears to be faster than it really is. It's easy to see why they like this. When you meter as they suggest, you base your entire exposure around the amount of light reaching the shadows rather than basing it upon the highlight as it should be. You will have plenty of detail in the shadow part of your image but your diffused highlights (the most important part of your photograph) will be randomly changing density on the film which in turn will cause your images to vary in both contrast and color balance. The change is due to the fact that as you create lighting with different styles and ratios the difference between the light from the main light and the fill light will change. When you base your exposure on the shadows, the all important highlight jumps around with your lighting style and ratio. Does it make sense to base your entire exposure upon what the shadows look like rather than what the highlight part of the face looks like? No way! This old method (which makes the film appear to be faster than it really is) places the all important diffused highlights as the least important part of the negative. Once you have tested and established a a working ISO for the film you are using and are metering correctly and consistently, you will have detail in every shadow regardless of whether you are using a gentle ratio or a heavy one and more importantly you will have diffused highlights that are virtually identical from first frame to last. No special processing is required. Your lab will love you and your images will be consistent and predictable. |
On which meter do I set the ISO?Due to the frequency of this question I have also included it in the Metering Q & A section. When you set the ISO on
your flash meter, do I also set the same ISO on the meter
in my camera? Back to Top |
| Beginner's depression
Scott, |
Have
a question that was not answered here?
|
www.LightingMagic.com
Copyright © Scott Smith. All rights reserved.
Revised: February 07, 2005.